The Judgment Test: Evaluating Autonomous AI Systems Beyond Outcome Correctness

Read full text
Authors: Donglin Liang
Cited by: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces the Judgment Test, a process-oriented framework for evaluating AI systems that exercise delegated judgment under uncertainty. As modern AI systems increasingly interpret intent, resolve ambiguity, and act under incomplete specification, traditional outcome-based evaluation methods—such as correctness checks or benchmark scores—become impractical and insufficient. The Judgment Test shifts evaluation away from end-state correctness and toward how judgment is exercised during execution, focusing on delegatability, governability, and evolvability. Rather than producing a binary pass–fail result, the test yields a profile of how an AI system performs as judgment is progressively delegated and governance conditions change. The framework is applicable across domains including AI-assisted software development, information filtering, and retrieval-augmented generation, and is intended to support responsible deployment and governance of judgment-capable AI systems.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
20 January 2026
Document type
Preprint