Solitude Is Better Than Staying with Those Who Devalue Us: A State of Calm for Reflection

This article argues that voluntary solitude may hold greater value for well-being than remaining in unsupportive or devaluing relationships. Drawing on Western psychological research that clearly distinguishes solitude from loneliness, the study highlights the role of autonomy in emotional regulation and overall psychological well-being. The discussion is further integrated with basic Eastern contemplative practices, particularly mindfulness and self-reflection in everyday life. The article develops into a conceptual proposal grounded in the framework of the Buddharaksa Moral Community, viewing deliberate withdrawal from harmful relationships not as social avoidance but as a means of preserving personal dignity and enhancing the long-term quality of coexistence. The concept of Intermittent Fasting (IF) is employed as a metaphor for disciplined relational withdrawal pausing to restore, not withdrawing to escape.