The N ≠ Nₑ Problem: A Foundational Error in Neutral Theory

Read full text
Authors: Vox Day, Claude Athos
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Kimura's neutral theory rests on the theorem that the neutral substitution rate equals the mutation rate (k = μ), independent of population size. This result derives from a cancellation: 2Nμ mutations arise per generation, each with fixation probability 1/(2N), yielding k = μ. We demonstrate that this derivation contains a critical equivocation: the N in the mutation supply term represents census population size (individuals replicating DNA), while the N in the fixation probability derives from Wright-Fisher assumptions where it represents effective population size. For the cancellation to hold, census N must equal Ne—a condition violated by every natural population. In mammals, census populations exceed diversity-derived Ne by 19- to 46-fold. This error, present in both Kimura's 1968 Nature paper and his 1983 monograph, propagates into molecular clock calibrations, coalescent inference, and divergence time estimates across the tree of life.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Evolution and Genetic Dynamics Genetic diversity and population structure Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
29 January 2026
Document type
Preprint