The Maley Corpus — Family 0: Interpretive Boundary Conditions (v1.0)

This record contains Family 0 of the Maley Corpus, a closed set of papers establishing interpretive, metric, and structural boundary conditions for admissible reasoning in physics, mathematics, and related formal domains. Scope and intent The papers in this collection are non-constructive and eliminative. Their purpose is to identify and formalize what cannot be taken as primitive, transported across scopes, or repaired post hoc without violating internal coherence or standing. They do not propose new physical mechanisms, computational architectures, or operational systems. Instead, they establish necessary boundary conditions that any admissible framework must satisfy. What this collection is A set of boundary and impossibility results A closure at the level of interpretation and admissibility A demonstration that certain common moves (e.g. metric reification, ontic time, probabilistic legitimacy, post-hoc repair) are structurally invalid, not merely problematic What this collection is not It is not an implementation, algorithm, protocol, or governance system It is not a software, toolkit, or enforcement mechanism It does not describe how admissibility is operationally enforced It does not claim experimental validation or empirical completeness Any references to frameworks or architectures are purely contextual and do not disclose design, operation, or instantiation details. Structure This record is published as a single citable research object. The individual papers are intended to be read as a coherent family, not as independent or modular proposals. Selective citation of isolated components without the surrounding boundary context is discouraged. Citation guidance Please cite this record as a whole using the Zenodo concept DOI.Individual papers may be referenced by filename for internal clarity, but they are not standalone publications in this release. Status This release represents a foundational boundary layer only.No claims are made here regarding deployment, engineering feasibility, or enforcement completeness.