L3_8 No Relaxation Corollaries

Read full text
Authors: Amos Maley
Cited by: 0

Abstract

This paper derives a set of corollaries from constraint saturation and standing conservation showing that no admissible relaxation is possible within a closed epistemic interior. It proves that any attempted weakening, softening, or partial suspension of constraints—whether local, conditional, or compensatory—necessarily collapses admissibility by reintroducing illicit parameters, hidden scope transport, or standing violation. The results are eliminative and non-constructive: no alternative regimes are proposed, no procedures are given, and no operational guidance is provided. The paper functions as a boundary consolidation, making explicit that relaxation is not an admissible degree of freedom but a structural impossibility once closure is achieved.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Logic Reasoning and Knowledge Epistemology Ethics and Metaphysics Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
7 February 2026