L3_4 Removal Induced Collapse

This paper establishes a collapse result for closed admissible systems showing that constraint removal is not a benign operation. It proves that removing any admissible constraint—whether interpreted as simplification, approximation, or abstraction—necessarily induces collapse by reintroducing hidden parameters, illicit scope transport, or standing violation. The analysis is eliminative and non-constructive: it introduces no new primitives, specifies no procedures, and offers no alternative constructions. The result functions as a boundary theorem, demonstrating that admissibility is not robust under subtraction and that apparent redundancy cannot be safely excised once the admissible interior is saturated.