D3 Anchor Violation Question Classes

This paper establishes a classification of question types that constitute anchor violations within a closed admissible framework. It proves that certain questions are illicit not because they lack answers, but because their formulation presupposes scope transport, external authority, or standing reallocation that is disallowed by admissibility. Such questions are shown to collapse the admissible boundary regardless of how they are answered. The analysis is strictly classificatory and eliminative: it introduces no new primitives, specifies no procedures, and provides no evaluative or operational tests. The result functions as a boundary theorem, fixing which classes of questions are structurally invalid in closed systems and preventing inadvertent anchor violation through inquiry itself.