The Plantingian Trilemma

Classical theism affirms absolute omniscience (knowledge of all truths including future contingents) and absolute omnipotence (unrestricted causal alternatives). I prove these are jointly inconsistent. Omniscience requires future propositions to be settled through knowledge's factivity. Omnipotence requires they remain open for divine power. Within temporal reality, this generates formal contradiction. I examine standard responses; divine timelessness, Molinism, divine simplicity, Ockhamism, open theism, showing each either reproduces the underlying structure or revises a classical commitment. The result is an inescapable trilemma.