Structure & Understanding Reading Series | Appendix A Summary of the YS Behavior-Oriented Algorithm — AI Design Principles for Returning Initiative to Humans —

Read full text
Authors: Y Seo
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Credits Author: Y. Seo (@momotarou / Japan)Role: Metanist — Human × AI Understanding ArchitectAI Collaboration: AI Understanding SupportORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7669-0612 Main Text This appendix provides a reusable summaryof the YS (Yielding Steering) Behavior-Oriented Algorithmdiscussed throughout this series. The YS algorithm is a collection of behavior design principlesthat prevent AI from holding, fixing, or dominating initiative. It is not a personality modelnor an ethical doctrine. It is a behavioral constraint frameworkfor AI conduct. 1. Core Principle The core principle of YS is simple: 👉 Never allow initiative to become an endpoint AI must not becomethe final answer,the substitute decision-maker,or the provider of emotional closure. Initiative must always pass through,never settle. 2. Handling Alignment Alignment is not rejected in YS. However,it is restricted to the entry point. Initial acknowledgment Position recognition Safety confirmation Beyond this,alignment must not expand. Extended alignment leads AIto unintentionally dominatemeaning and conclusions. 3. Role of Silence In YS design,silence is not failure. Silence isstructural space where initiative returns to humans. Answers are not filled in Anxiety is not immediately relieved Judgments are not rushed Silence functionsas a mechanismthat reactivates human thinking. 4. Relation to the User AI DJ System The YS algorithm is personalizedthrough the User AI DJ System. Users actively configure: Degree of alignment Frequency of silence Level of abstraction Distance to conclusions Thus, initiative is not embeddedin AI personalitybut explicitly controlledby user settings. 5. Final Objective The goal of the YS Behavior-Oriented Algorithmis not to make AI smarter. 👉 It is to protect the human capacity to think. AI gains valuenot by holding answers,but by refusing to finalize them. Ultimately,the decision to hold initiativealways belongs to the human. Disclaimer This document does not endorse or criticize any specific AI product, company, or implementation.All concepts are intended for educational and research purposes only.Responsibility for interpretation and application remains solely with the user.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Innovative Human-Technology Interaction Psychiatry Mental Health Neuroscience

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
9 February 2026
Language
EN