STI Model (Space-Time Informational): A Threshold-Based Unified Dynamic Framework

Read full text
Authors: matteo grassetti
Cited by: 0

Abstract

The STI model proposes a unified dynamic framework in which space, time, and information are not independent entities, but coupled components of a single complex physical system. When critical thresholds of density, coherence, or coupling are exceeded, local descriptions lose validity, while a stable global function emerges, observable as shared patterns across apparently distinct domains. The model does not introduce new ontological entities but provides a conceptual lens to compare general relativity, quantum mechanics, and complex systems.1. Context and MotivationModern physics effectively describes specific domains: general relativity for continuous space-time structures and quantum mechanics for microscopic and informational dynamics. However, these descriptions become difficult to reconcile in threshold regimes characterized by high density, strong coupling, or extended coherence.The STI model observes that in such regimes, systems of different nature display convergent behaviors: reduction of local descriptions, informational compression, and emergence of robust stability patterns. Similar phenomena also appear in non-physical complex systems, suggesting a shared underlying dynamic principle.2. Core HypothesesNon-hierarchical coupling: space, time, and information operate as co-constitutive subsystems. Their separation is only an approximation valid far from critical thresholds.Dynamic regimes: the system admits form-dominant regimes (sub-threshold), transition regimes (near-threshold), and function-dominant regimes (post-threshold).Descriptive limits: singularities or local divergences signal the breakdown of a local description, not a physical divergence.Functional emergence: beyond threshold, global behavior is better described by a stable function rather than by independent local variables.3. Threshold Dynamics and Layer0A threshold represents a regime transition: as coupling between subsystems increases, local descriptions lose precision while stable global structures emerge.Layer0 is the functional stability pattern that appears when local descriptions collapse. It is unique, domain-independent, and represents the common underlying dynamic.Examples:In general relativity, near regions of extreme curvature, local notions of time lose universality, yet a global causal structure remains defined.In quantum mechanics, processes such as decoherence show that local phase information is lost while a stable statistical dynamic survives.In complex systems, attractors, resonances, and self-organization represent macroscopic manifestations of the same stabilization logic.4. Stability Patterns and Meta-RegulationNear threshold, mechanisms of distributed self-regulation emerge from the interaction of subsystems with finite tolerances.Analogies include neural networks, dissipative structures, and synchronized systems.Global behavior stabilizes the system, preventing destructive convergence and allowing the processing and redistribution of information beyond the capacity of isolated subsystems.5. Connections Between Quantum Mechanics, General Relativity, and Complex SystemsThe model allows known phenomena to be interpreted as manifestations of a shared underlying dynamic principle:Quantum mechanics: measurement and decoherence as informational threshold transitions.General relativity: curvature and time dilation as regime variations of space-time.Complex systems: resonance, self-organization, and criticality as macroscopic analogues of the same principle.The domains are not unified through new fundamental equations, but through a common dynamic principle.6. Oscillatory Dynamics and System CooperationSpace, time, and information oscillate in phase according to resonance and synchronization coupling.Cooperation is not generic; each subsystem functions as a function of the others.Overall dynamics emerge from oscillations, attractors, distributed interactions, and self-organization.Emergent effects depend on density, coherence, and local subsystem regimes.7. InformationInformation is matter and energy, and includes relations between elements, coupling, and constraints.It determines how space curves and how time dilates.It is conserved: it may accumulate, dissipate, transform, or convert, but cannot be annihilated or generated from nothing.It is the only element capable of altering space-time and the physical manifestation of the system.8. Applications and ScopeThe STI model provides a conceptual language useful for:Analyzing systems in threshold regimes.Comparing heterogeneous phenomena without reducing them to a single scale.Identifying stability and instability conditions in strongly coupled systems.Limitations include the need for domain-specific operational translations and experimental difficulty in controlling near-threshold regimes.9. FalsifiabilitySTI would be falsified if:Stable functional patterns do not emerge in controlled threshold regimes.Variations in coupling do not modify global system behavior.The model offers no interpretative advantage compared to standard frameworks.10. ConclusionsSTI interprets singularities and theoretical incompatibilities as signals of regime transitions rather than fundamental contradictions. It connects general relativity, quantum mechanics, and complex systems through shared stability patterns, providing a unified and coherent conceptual framework without replacing existing theories.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Relativity and Gravitational Theory Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories Complex Systems and Dynamics

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
16 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint