The Law of Alignment Applied to Psychological Systems: Cumulative Stress Imbalance and Boundary Collapse

This paper presents a formal psychological articulation of the Law of Alignment, a domain-neutral structural hypothesis positing that systemic stability is contingent upon the proportional coherence between accumulated demand and adaptive capacity over time. In psychological systems, accumulation is defined as the retained cognitive, emotional, and behavioral load necessitating ongoing regulation, while adaptive capacity denotes the available regulatory, recovery, and integrative resources. It is hypothesized that instability arises not from isolated stressors but from sustained proportional misalignment between these variables. The framework introduces a formal alignment ratio and a cumulative deviation function to model longitudinal imbalances. Burnout, rigidity, withdrawal, and psychological collapse are interpreted as corrective boundary responses following prolonged structural overload. The paper specifies measurable operational proxies, delineates conditions for falsifiability, and outlines empirical pathways for validation. Although articulated within the field of psychology, the alignment formulation is structurally domain-neutral and compatible with organizational, ecological, financial, and infrastructure systems. This work serves as a formal stress test of the Law of Alignment within human mental health and advances a replicable proportional modeling framework for longitudinal investigation. This manuscript is theoretical and intended as a structured hypothesis pending empirical validation.