Symbolic Mechanics — Volume VII: Attraction Tension, Visibility Differential, and the Oscillation of Boundary Forces

Read full text
Authors: A.N. Eidos
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Volume 7 Why does attraction feel like a magnetic pull – not a conscious decision, not a calculated preference, but a tension that arises before any meaningful interaction has occurred? Existing computational models of interpersonal attraction treat it as a function of similarity, familiarity, or reward prediction. They cannot explain why attraction tension emerges from the interaction of visibility differential (ΔV), fixed safety radius (Rₛ), and exit‑pattern homology – with no emotional content, no memory, and no physical contact required. Volume 7 of Symbolic Mechanics formalises attraction tension as a structural field, not a psychological state. Three variables generate the field: · Visibility differential (ΔV) – the gap in internal symbolic resolution between two systems. When one system has higher clarity, the lower‑visibility system experiences amplified collapse and activates existence‑seeking, pulling toward the higher‑resolution system as a potential external anchor.· Safety radius (Rₛ) – a fixed boundary that cannot be altered by attraction, intention, or familiarity. The system cannot approach beyond Rₛ without destabilisation. This produces a forward impulse (F₁) and a backward counterforce (F₂) that coexist as a single oscillatory field.· Exit‑pattern homology – when two systems share the same dominant defensive exit (especially Exit‑2, avoidance/suppression), their internal routing structures align. This produces structural resonance, increasing both the approach impulse and the fear component simultaneously. When ΔV, Rₛ, and homology co‑exist, the system enters an oscillatory state: micro‑approach activates Rₛ, producing micro‑retreat; ΔV persists, restarting approach; exit homology amplifies the cycle. Neither force dominates. The unresolved oscillation is attraction tension – not mixed feelings, not ambivalence, but a mechanically unstable two‑force equilibrium. The subjective impression of “magnetism” is the experience of sustained unresolved cycling. This model provides a computational framework for attraction as structural field, approach‑retreat oscillation without volition, and the necessity of exit homology for high‑intensity tension – problems that standard similarity‑based and reward‑based attraction models cannot resolve because they lack visibility differential mechanics, a fixed safety radius, and exit‑pattern homology as an amplifier. --- Part of the 44‑volume Symbolic Mechanics system. For the foundational engine mechanics → Volume I For visibility collapse, fog, and existence compensation → Volume VI For attraction tension as a structural field → Volume VII Keywords: Symbolic Mechanics, attraction tension, visibility differential, safety radius, exit homology, oscillatory field, approach‑retreat cycle, structural field

Fields of Study & Subjects

Attachment and Relationship Dynamics Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior Cognitive Science and Education Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
6 March 2026
Language
EN