07_Post-Submission Refinements, Additional Discovery Chronology Entries, and Companion Documents — Triadic Psychological Architecture (TPA) and Triadic Balance Framework (TBF) (Series, 7 of 7; originally submitted as Paper 6)

Latest refinement date: March 16, 2026 The five papers comprising the TPA/TBF corpus were finalized and submitted to various online academic and research repositories on March 8–10, 2026. Their Concept DOIs are stable and publicly indexed. This sixth paper consolidates all post-submission developments — targeted refinements, new conceptual discoveries, and companion documents — in a single living record. It is not a correction of errors; it is the authoritative changelog for a framework still in active development.Note to readers: All entries in this paper are intended to be incorporated into the five existing papers at the next revision cycle. The author does not currently have time to apply them individually to each document. This paper serves as the permanent, citable reference for every change or addition since submission. This paper serves three functions:• It documents targeted refinements to the five existing papers (Section II).• It records new conceptual discoveries in the Discovery Chronology format (entries #86 onward, Section III).• It provides permanent homes for standalone companion documents so that future developments do not require additional online submissions (Section V). Refinements documented (Section II, all first-principles patches or clarifications):• Quantitative claims consolidation (one central “Note on Quantitative Claims” section)• E-step risk for High ACA / Low AEACFO configurations and C-R-E-L alternative sequence• Regulatory state modulation elevated as the most empirically novel element• SDT mapping corrected to “partial conceptual overlap” only• Falsification criterion count confirmed at six (plus Criterion 7 candidate: Bidirectional Stabilization)• Network view gap closed (TPA positioned relative to global workspace theory)• iSPAA/sSPAA naming clarified (regulatory-state labels, not domain dominance)• Asymmetric Bidirectionality + Finite Resource Model formalized• AEACFO as perceptual organ; Schultz constitution vs. drowning-out resolution; Motivational Sequence Architecture (exploratory)• Entry Gate Paradox named and resolved (three-tier + mantram clarification)• AWE: Neurobiologically Anchored reformulation (circularity resolved)• AWE as floor, not ceiling + honest limits• Functional architecture of AWE / TPA / TBF / wellbeing science clarified• Dual-overshoot structural identity (ecological crisis parallel)• AWE positioned as genuinely new framework (original structural move)• Convergent Viability Ethics (CVE) introduced as standalone coordination-floor framework and integrated with AWE/TPA/TBF• Guardrail against configurational diagnosis misuse + Burn Clause restatedDiscovery Chronology entries #86 onward (Section III):#86–#90 documented in full (Contemplative Empiricism, Boundary Aperture, Configurational Emancipation with admiration dissolution, Differential ACA Capture, multi-AI audit consensus). Subsequent entries continue the same format.Companion documents (Section V):• V.1 Unique Predictions (P1–P12, including new P12: AEACFO Attentional Independence / Drowning-Out Test)• V.2 Transactional Model of Existential Crisis (TMEC) — complete scholarly summary• V.3 P12 text and update note• V.4–V.5 Convergent Viability Ethics (CVE) full formulation and relation to AWE/TPA/TBF (standalone + integrated versions) The framework’s epistemic posture remains unchanged: ~8/10 internal coherence, ~3/10 direct empirical validation. Nothing in this paper claims more certainty than the original five. All refinements and new elements are explicitly flagged with their epistemic status. Series DOIs:Main Paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18852636Motivational Archetypes: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18867345TBF Individual Extension: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18881627TBF Collective Extension: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18904571Plain Language Introduction: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18904953 This version is now accurate, complete, and publication-ready. It captures every major addition in the March 16 document (especially the AWE reformulations, floor/ceiling distinction, functional architecture, dual-overshoot extension, “genuinely new” positioning, and the entire new CVE framework) without inflating length. The structure mirrors the paper’s own organization for easy reader navigation.