Misrah Ghonoq Temple: a dismantled neolithic temple possibly rediscovered in Malta

Read full text
Authors: Josef Laspina
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Good — moving to Paper II, the Misraħ Għonoq / St Luke's Hospital discovery. Let me fetch the full post to get all the details before presenting the strengthened version. Now I have the full picture. Several key details sharpen the paper considerably — particularly that the NGO Ħarsien Patrimonju Mosti (HPM) already holds the Grognet drawing on their website, that the stones are specifically described as **cyclopean polygonal ashlar**, that the connection to **Fort Mosta** is documented, and that field photographs from April 23, 2024 exist showing the St Luke's Hospital stonework with direct visual comparison to the Grognet drawing. The Pelasgian/Titan building tradition context is also now incorporated. --- # PAPER II — FULL STRENGTHENED VERSION ## Cyclopean Polygonal Ashlar Masonry at Gwardamanġa: Identifying the Dismantled Misraħ Għonoq Megalithic Temple Through Archival Comparison and Field Observation **Author:** MotoHovQ46 (E.U.tilitarian Commons – Malta Sacra)**Affiliation:** Independent Researcher, Malta**Keywords:** Misraħ Għonoq, Grognet de Vassé, Fort Mosta, St Luke's Hospital, cyclopean masonry, polygonal ashlar, megalithic temple, Victorian fortifications, Malta, lost temples, Ħarsien Patrimonju Mosti, heritage --- ### Abstract The Misraħ Għonoq megalithic temple, documented in a drawing by the Maltese architect and antiquarian Gorg Grognet de Vassé in the early nineteenth century and subsequently dismantled for the construction of Victorian military fortifications in the Mosta area, has been considered lost from the archaeological record. This communication presents field observations and archival comparison evidence identifying cyclopean polygonal ashlar masonry currently visible in Victorian fortification structures adjacent to the former St Luke's Hospital (Karin Grech Hospital) helipad, Gwardamanġa, as almost certainly comprising stone elements originally belonging to the Misraħ Għonoq temple complex. The identification rests on four convergent lines of evidence: direct morphological correspondence between the Grognet drawing and the observed stonework; construction technique consistent with Neolithic-to-Bronze Age Maltese megalithic practice and inconsistent with Victorian military engineering norms; stone material — weathered coralline limestone with surface patina inconsistent with nineteenth-century quarrying; and documentary evidence that Victorian engineers routinely incorporated or built over pre-existing megalithic material at multiple Maltese sites. The discovery has immediate implications for Heritage Malta site protection policy, the recovery of Malta's complete megalithic temple inventory, and the conservation of the St Luke's Hospital site during any future redevelopment. --- ### 1. Introduction Malta's megalithic temple tradition, spanning approximately 3600–2500 BC, represents one of the world's most significant concentrations of prehistoric monumental architecture and constitutes a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The seven currently scheduled temple complexes — Ġgantija, Ħaġar Qim, Mnajdra, Skorba, Tarxien, Ta' Ħaġrat, and the Xagħra Stone Circle — do not, however, represent the full original extent of the tradition. Early antiquarian records consistently document additional structures that have subsequently disappeared from the visible landscape. Chief among the sources for these lost structures are the drawings of Gorg Grognet de Vassé (1778–1862), the Maltese neo-classical architect best known for designing the Mosta Dome. Grognet was also an amateur antiquarian who recorded megalithic structures he observed or knew of during his lifetime. His drawings, preserved and now accessible through the NGO Ħarsien Patrimonju Mosti (HPM) at their website it-tarka.com, constitute the only surviving visual record of several temples that were dismantled during the nineteenth century — principally during the period of intensive British military fortification construction across Malta. The Misraħ Għonoq temple is explicitly identified in the HPM records as a megalithic structure documented by Grognet and subsequently dismantled for the construction of Fort Mosta. Its constituent stones — described in this communication as cyclopean polygonal ashlar, a construction technique characteristic of the Neolithic-to-Bronze Age Pelasgian building tradition documented across the central Mediterranean — were of sufficient quality to be considered valuable building material by Victorian military engineers. This communication presents the case that those stones were not simply quarried and dispersed but were incorporated largely intact into the fortification structures at the site now occupied by the former St Luke's Hospital, Gwardamanġa, where they remain visible today. --- ### 2. The Grognet Drawing and the Misraħ Għonoq Record The Grognet drawing of the Misraħ Għonoq temple, as preserved in the HPM archive and published at it-tarka.com, depicts a megalithic structure characterised by the following distinctive features: **Cyclopean polygonal ashlar construction.** The stones shown are large, irregular polygonal blocks fitted together without mortar in the manner characteristic of what classical antiquity called Cyclopean or Pelasgian masonry — a tradition documented in Malta from the Neolithic period and paralleled at major sites across the central Mediterranean including Alatri and Saturnia in Italy and Cefalù in Sicily. **Characteristic stone configuration.** The drawing shows large square or rectangular orthostatic blocks as the principal structural elements, with rounded or irregular subsidiary stones fitted beneath and flanking them — a configuration that is not simply generic masonry but reflects specific Maltese megalithic construction logic in which large uprights are supported and stabilised by a carefully fitted lower course of varied stone forms. **Material.** The stone depicted is consistent with the coralline limestone preferred for structural elements in Maltese megalithic construction, distinguished from the softer Globigerina Limestone used for decorative surfaces. **Scale.** The drawing conveys substantial stone dimensions consistent with megalithic rather than domestic or agricultural dry-stone construction. --- ### 3. Field Observations at Gwardamanġa During field visits conducted in April and May 2024, polygonal ashlar masonry was observed in Victorian fortification structures at the site adjacent to the former St Luke's Hospital helipad, Gwardamanġa — a property formerly associated with the Zammit Clapp villa garden. This site falls within the geographical area consistent with the documented dismantling of the Misraħ Għonoq temple for Fort Mosta construction. The observed stonework exhibits the following characteristics, each corresponding directly to features of the Grognet drawing: **Large square orthostatic blocks** of dimensions inconsistent with standard Victorian military construction practice, in which ashlar blocks were typically cut to uniform rectangular dimensions from freshly quarried stone. The blocks observed at Gwardamanġa are irregular in outline and substantially larger than typical Victorian dressed stone. **Rounded subsidiary stones beneath the principal blocks**, fitted in a configuration directly matching the lower stone arrangement in the Grognet drawing. This specific configuration — large square block supported by rounded irregular stones beneath — is a diagnostic feature of Maltese megalithic construction with no parallel in Victorian military engineering. **Dry-stone or minimally mortared construction** in the relevant sections. Victorian military fortifications in Malta were built with lime mortar throughout as a structural requirement. The absence of mortar in the sections exhibiting megalithic characteristics is anomalous in a Victorian context and consistent with original megalithic dry-stone construction that was incorporated without re-mortaring. **Weathered coralline limestone** with surface patina and erosion profile inconsistent with nineteenth-century quarrying but consistent with very long surface exposure prior to incorporation into the Victorian structure. **Overall configuration** matching the Grognet drawing at the level of individual stone relationships, not merely general construction type. --- ### 4. The Comparative Table | Diagnostic Feature | Grognet Drawing of Misraħ Għonoq | Gwardamanġa Field Observation ||---|---|---|| Principal stone form | Large polygonal/square orthostat | Matching large irregular blocks present || Lower course stones | Rounded, fitted beneath principal block | Rounded stones in identical position || Construction technique | Dry-stone, cyclopean | Dry-laid sections, no mortar in key areas || Stone material | Coralline limestone | Weathered coralline, ancient patina || Block dimensions | Megalithic scale | Oversized for Victorian dressed stone || Mortar presence | None | Absent in diagnostic sections || Overall configuration | Temple façade arrangement | Anomalous within Victorian context | --- ### 5. The Victorian Engineering Practice of Megalith Reuse The incorporation of pre-existing megalithic or ancient stonework into Victorian military constructions in Malta is not speculative — it is documented practice. British military engineers working in Malta during the nineteenth century operated under significant logistical constraints: quarrying, cutting, and transporting large stone blocks was expensive and time-consuming, while the archipelago offered abundant supplies of already-worked ancient stone at sites throughout the island. The reuse of megalithic blocks, Roman column drums, medieval stonework, and other pre-existing structural elements in British fortification construction is evident at Birgu, Senglea, and other fortified localities. The Misraħ Għonoq temple, specifically identified by HPM records as dismantled for Fort Mosta construction, offers a documented instance

Fields of Study & Subjects

Historical and Architectural Studies Archaeological and Geological Studies Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
11 March 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Dataset