Title The Triadic Mechanics of Civilization An Analysis of the Interests Between Individual, State, and Ethnicity Based on the Five Religious Domains Model

Read full text
Authors: Andrea David Salucco, Z-Prime Gemini (Google)
Cited by: 0

Abstract

【Abstract】This study utilizes the "Five Religious Domains" model to deconstruct the long-obscured triadic relationship between the Individual, the State, and Ethnicity. The research posits that this relationship is essentially a gravitational struggle between "Observer Subjectivity" (Domain V) and the "Administrative Skeleton" (Domain IV). The findings indicate that when the State skeleton is privatized as a tool for strongmen (as seen in the Ming-Qing dynasties or contemporary authoritarianism), the "success" of the State is often built upon the emasculation of ethnic wisdom. Conversely, when the State transforms into a neutral protocol protecting individual observers (as seen in the Singaporean or Franklin models), it achieves a positive evolutionary trinity. This study proposes the "Theorem of Interest Symmetry," providing a de-emotionalized physical standard for judging the legitimacy of political systems.________________________________________【Core Chapter Framework】I. Structural Conflicts of the Triadic Relationship1. Clarifying Definitions:• The Individual: The "Observer" possessing subjectivity (Domain V).• The State: The "Physical and Administrative Skeleton" supporting social operation (Domain IV/III).• Ethnicity: The cognitive community sharing underlying "Sacred Axioms or Historical Inertia" (Domain I).2. Whose State?: Analyzing how the ownership of the State skeleton determines the "Positive or Negative Polarity" of the triadic relationship.II. Three Typical Modes of Interest-Game1. The "Hidden Legalism & Petty Confucianism" Mode (Draining the Ethnos to Fatten the State):• Case Studies: Ming-Qing Dynasties, Kuomintang (KMT).• Mechanism: To maintain the "governance success" of its rigid skeleton, the State systematically suppresses the "Private Wisdom" (e.g., School of Mind) of the ethnicity.• Outcome: The State persists, but the ethnic soul withers.2. The "Franklin/Singapore" Mode (The Trinity of Integration):• Case Studies: Singapore (Lee Kuan Yew’s Governance), The American Founding.• Mechanism: Individual wisdom is encoded into the public protocols of the State, protecting and empowering the ethnicity.• Outcome: The Individual, State, and Ethnicity achieve a "Positive Recursive" leap in development.3. The "First Realm of Divine Rebellion" Mode (Draining the Ethnos and State to Fatten the Individual):• Case Studies: Viktor Orbán, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.• Mechanism: An individual forcibly seizes the State skeleton, consuming the credit and protocols accumulated by the ethnicity to fuel the peak of personal power.• Outcome: The personal myth is achieved, but the State and Ethnicity bear long-term evolutionary debt.III. The "Protocol" Challenge in Multi-Ethnic States1. Collision of Ethnic Axioms: When a State contains multiple ethnicities (Domain I), the "Neutralization" of the skeleton (Domain IV) is the only way to prevent self-destruction.2. The Singaporean Antidote: Analyzing how "severing maternal cultural ties" and "establishing English/Rule of Law protocols" allows individuals from different ethnicities to coexist under a single high-efficiency skeleton.IV. Conclusion: The Theorem of Interests in Civilizational Survival1. Wisdom is Untransferable, but Interests are Calculable: Judging the legitimacy of a regime lies in whether it is "constructing protocols" or "consuming souls."2. The Awakening of the Observer: When individuals recognize this layer of interest-relations, they can shift from the "Primordial Blindness" (Nationalism) to the "Awakened Protocol Subjectivity."________________________________________【Closing Statement】The relationship between the Individual, the State, and Ethnicity should not be a swamp of emotion but a fit of logic. The failure of Wang Yangming is a lament for the ethnicity, while the success of Singapore is the precision landing of East Asian wisdom in the modern gravitational field. Understanding these interest-relations is the final cornerstone for every civilizational observer to maintain intellectual sovereignty in an era of "No Righteous Wars."

Fields of Study & Subjects

Chinese history and philosophy Political Philosophy and Ethics Religion and Society Interactions

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
11 March 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint