Title The Triadic Mechanics of Civilization An Analysis of the Interests Between Individual, State, and Ethnicity Based on the Five Religious Domains Model
Abstract
【Abstract】This study utilizes the "Five Religious Domains" model to deconstruct the long-obscured triadic relationship between the Individual, the State, and Ethnicity. The research posits that this relationship is essentially a gravitational struggle between "Observer Subjectivity" (Domain V) and the "Administrative Skeleton" (Domain IV). The findings indicate that when the State skeleton is privatized as a tool for strongmen (as seen in the Ming-Qing dynasties or contemporary authoritarianism), the "success" of the State is often built upon the emasculation of ethnic wisdom. Conversely, when the State transforms into a neutral protocol protecting individual observers (as seen in the Singaporean or Franklin models), it achieves a positive evolutionary trinity. This study proposes the "Theorem of Interest Symmetry," providing a de-emotionalized physical standard for judging the legitimacy of political systems.________________________________________【Core Chapter Framework】I. Structural Conflicts of the Triadic Relationship1. Clarifying Definitions:• The Individual: The "Observer" possessing subjectivity (Domain V).• The State: The "Physical and Administrative Skeleton" supporting social operation (Domain IV/III).• Ethnicity: The cognitive community sharing underlying "Sacred Axioms or Historical Inertia" (Domain I).2. Whose State?: Analyzing how the ownership of the State skeleton determines the "Positive or Negative Polarity" of the triadic relationship.II. Three Typical Modes of Interest-Game1. The "Hidden Legalism & Petty Confucianism" Mode (Draining the Ethnos to Fatten the State):• Case Studies: Ming-Qing Dynasties, Kuomintang (KMT).• Mechanism: To maintain the "governance success" of its rigid skeleton, the State systematically suppresses the "Private Wisdom" (e.g., School of Mind) of the ethnicity.• Outcome: The State persists, but the ethnic soul withers.2. The "Franklin/Singapore" Mode (The Trinity of Integration):• Case Studies: Singapore (Lee Kuan Yew’s Governance), The American Founding.• Mechanism: Individual wisdom is encoded into the public protocols of the State, protecting and empowering the ethnicity.• Outcome: The Individual, State, and Ethnicity achieve a "Positive Recursive" leap in development.3. The "First Realm of Divine Rebellion" Mode (Draining the Ethnos and State to Fatten the Individual):• Case Studies: Viktor Orbán, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.• Mechanism: An individual forcibly seizes the State skeleton, consuming the credit and protocols accumulated by the ethnicity to fuel the peak of personal power.• Outcome: The personal myth is achieved, but the State and Ethnicity bear long-term evolutionary debt.III. The "Protocol" Challenge in Multi-Ethnic States1. Collision of Ethnic Axioms: When a State contains multiple ethnicities (Domain I), the "Neutralization" of the skeleton (Domain IV) is the only way to prevent self-destruction.2. The Singaporean Antidote: Analyzing how "severing maternal cultural ties" and "establishing English/Rule of Law protocols" allows individuals from different ethnicities to coexist under a single high-efficiency skeleton.IV. Conclusion: The Theorem of Interests in Civilizational Survival1. Wisdom is Untransferable, but Interests are Calculable: Judging the legitimacy of a regime lies in whether it is "constructing protocols" or "consuming souls."2. The Awakening of the Observer: When individuals recognize this layer of interest-relations, they can shift from the "Primordial Blindness" (Nationalism) to the "Awakened Protocol Subjectivity."________________________________________【Closing Statement】The relationship between the Individual, the State, and Ethnicity should not be a swamp of emotion but a fit of logic. The failure of Wang Yangming is a lament for the ethnicity, while the success of Singapore is the precision landing of East Asian wisdom in the modern gravitational field. Understanding these interest-relations is the final cornerstone for every civilizational observer to maintain intellectual sovereignty in an era of "No Righteous Wars."
Fields of Study & Subjects
Chinese history and philosophy
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Religion and Society Interactions
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Publication date
- 11 March 2026
- Language
- EN
- Document type
- Preprint