Reell frihet, EIR och ekonomiskt vardagstryck

Read full text
Authors: J. E. Fröderberg
Cited by: 2

Abstract

This report develops a distribution-sensitive indicator framework for analysing economic everyday pressure, basic-needs pressure, and real room for action in Sweden during the period 2015–2024. The core indicators are the Essentials-to-Income Ratio (EIR), Disposable Freedom Space (DFU), and the Real Freedom Index (ReFI). Together, they are used to assess how much of disposable income per consumption unit is absorbed by a normed basket of basic and difficult-to-avoid expenses, and how much practical room for action remains after these needs are covered. The report should be understood as a methodological and indicator report within a broader research programme on structural viability, household carrying capacity, and social load shifting. It does not claim to measure actual household consumption, subjective well-being, full debt positions, or complete economic vulnerability. Instead, it operationalises a narrower empirical chain: the relationship between basic needs, income, and remaining economic margin. The main scenario shows that EIR increases across all income deciles between 2015 and 2024, with the greatest relative significance in the lower parts of the income distribution. The results also indicate a broader compression of room for action in lower and middle income positions. Because the basic-needs basket is deliberately narrow, the findings should be interpreted as a conservative lower-bound estimate of economic everyday pressure rather than as a complete assessment of households’ actual economic margins. This report develops a distribution-sensitive indicator framework for analysing economic everyday pressure, basic-needs pressure, and real room for action in Sweden during the period 2015–2024. The core indicators are the Essentials-to-Income Ratio (EIR), Disposable Freedom Space (DFU), and the Real Freedom Index (ReFI). Together, they are used to assess how much of disposable income per consumption unit is absorbed by a normed basket of basic and difficult-to-avoid expenses, and how much practical room for action remains after these needs are covered. The report should be understood as a methodological and indicator report within a broader research programme on structural viability, household carrying capacity, and social load shifting. It does not claim to measure actual household consumption, subjective well-being, full debt positions, or complete economic vulnerability. Instead, it operationalises a narrower empirical chain: the relationship between basic needs, income, and remaining economic margin. The main scenario shows that EIR increases across all income deciles between 2015 and 2024, with the greatest relative significance in the lower parts of the income distribution. The results also indicate a broader compression of room for action in lower and middle income positions. Because the basic-needs basket is deliberately narrow, the findings should be interpreted as a conservative lower-bound estimate of economic everyday pressure rather than as a complete assessment of households’ actual economic margins.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis Income Poverty and Inequality Unemployment and Economic Growth

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
29 April 2026
Language
SV
Document type
Preprint