Fundamental Dyadic Closure and Mirror-Doublet Exclusion in Quantum Traction Theory

Why a fundamental dyad cannot be reused as a mirror doublet Version: 2.1 Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20053461 Author: Ali Attar Website: quantumtraction.org Main book anchor: Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book v10.01 This paper closes the intra-address loophole behind the weak-chirality theorem. A QTT dyad is not a loose pair of labels. It is a two-leg address support, while a monadic A5 visible/hidden split is a single completed address seen through two readout shares. The address-support distinction is \[ |\mathcal I|=2\quad\hbox{for a fundamental dyadic support}, \qquad \pi^+(w)+\pi^-(w)=2\pi_w, \quad |\mathcal I|=1 \] for an intra-address visible/hidden relabelling. The latter saturates one address; it is not a second dyadic particle support. The load-bearing layer-arithmetic statement is \[ V_2=V_{\mathrm{vis}}\oplus V_{\mathrm{hid}}, \qquad \hbox{a second independent }L/R\hbox{ split would require } n\ge4 . \] At the elementary dyadic source layer A6 permits the two-leg split and A7 saturates one completed bundle. A second independent mirror doublet would overcount the same address capacity. The paper therefore makes the chirality closure non-circular: the weak branch is not selected by naming one side left. The possible mirror-doublet object is excluded before the laboratory name is attached. Status: QTT-FUNDAMENTAL-DYADIC-SUPPORT-CLOSED QTT-MIRROR-DOUBLET-INTRA-ADDRESS-LOOPHOLE-CLOSED QTT-CHIRALITY-LAYER-ARITHMETIC-HINGE-CLOSED