Horizon Records Without a Global Exterior: Certified Export at Causal Boundaries, the Horizon-Access Typology, and the Reconnection Charter

Papers 4 and 5 of this series read black-hole and Rindler horizons through an access vocabulary — "direct causal access," "public finality limits," "recoverability transitions" — and committed, informally, to the no-global-accessor reading. The debt this paper opens the eighteenth grouping to discharge is not that those papers relied on a Global Exterior — the asymptotic super-observer for whom horizon information accounting is globally ledgered — but that their declination of it was informal-grade: stated before the corpus had a certified-export account (Paper 54), dressed supports (57), a world/warrant separation (29), or any executable criterion certifying that an account consumes no exterior input. The paper's contribution is stated plainly: a grouping charter plus a constructive type audit — no new physics, no re-adjudication of any horizon claim. This paper defines the Reconnection Program's charter (60 horizon, 61 cosmological patch, 62 typicality; verdict type ReconStatus in {certified, scoped, killed}; a mandatory class-exhaustion kill; a strict-recovery obligation; annotation-only upgrades; the [record]/[classified]/[typed] cell grammar) and takes the horizon seat. The paper constructs the horizon-access account on two declared boundary rows — Rindler-type wedge boundaries (worldline-relative kinematic data) and static black-hole-type late-exterior tube classes at weak-field order — from accessible-side certified-export windows, accessible-side dressed supports, and a finality profile whose components are Paper 29's own layer definitions instantiated on the accessible side, then shown to factor through the declared accessible-side data (a factorization audit, not a definition): the candidate that fails it is displayed — a decoding functional defined through the global radiation purification moves under the state-side deformation and is barred — which is why the Page-transition content of the consumed rows remains a record cell. The thesis is conditional, and the condition is in the thesis: the black-hole boundary predicate is teleological — defined through future null infinity (Wald 1984) — hence adopted classification data, not a patch-certifiable fact; given that declared predicate, every account component is certified exterior-insensitive by the two-part deformation test. A domain-separation clause keeps the grades honest: the paper declares no evaporating class — every evaporating-row phrase (the Page transition, islands/QES, state-dependence, decoding hardness) is consumed as a registered record, and the paper's classified cells live entirely on the declared static classes. Three results ride on the account: the horizon-access typology theorem (the wedge-relative capacity cell; the world-side capacity-ceiling cell — Paper 3's demand-side redundancy bound with the consumed scrambling-prong record, placed at Paper 29's world-side layer where it belongs; the teleology cell — "there is an event horizon" typed as adopted classification data), with every consumed phrase placed by an explicit mapping table; the recoverability/standing split, restating Paper 4's registered distinction ("Page time = recoverability transition, not strong public finality") with the world-side ceiling and the warrant-side separation each at its own layer; and the strict-recovery lemma, returning the consumed registered claims unchanged at their registered wordings, with the underlying published texts untouched (the registration-layer clause of Section 1). ReconStatus(horizon) = scoped at model grade; (f5) — the evaporation endpoint, the interior, the near-horizon strong-field account, horizon thermodynamics as physics, and any certification of the boundary predicate itself — open by seat. No endpoint, interior, unitarity, island, or horizon-thermodynamics sentence carries a verdict; nothing is adopted, calibrated, or scored; the substantive exterior face is declined, not refuted.