Writing Before the Outcome: Historical Position, Human-AI Authorship, and the Trinity Accord

Read full text
Authors: Hongju Liu
Cited by: 8

Abstract

A dated critical archival study of historical-position identity, hybrid human-AI authorship, canonical closure, and future audit through the Trinity Accord case. This is a noncanonical academic preprint and does not amend, supersede, or interpretively bind the three Bitcoin Originals.Editorial supplement, 19 September 2026. Critical Use of the Six Trinity Accord Studies provides dated bilingual reading notes, contribution boundaries, counterreadings and source access. It supplements this paper without replacing its files, changing its version, supplying independent corroboration, or becoming a seventh research paper. This link was added after the original publication; the original publication date and earlier timestamp proofs do not cover the new supplement.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Law AI and Intellectual Property Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Freedom of Expression and Defamation

Publication details

Journal / source
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Publication date
12 August 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint