The Ordered Attribution Chain for Applicability Decisions: Evidence, Boundary Classification, Assessment, ACE Declaration, Transition Authorization, Execution Permission, Enforcement, and Record

This record deposits The Ordered Attribution Chain for Applicability Decisions: Evidence, Boundary Classification, Assessment, ACE Declaration, Transition Authorization, Execution Permission, Enforcement, and Record, together with subordinate Commercial Companion Note 15, Typed Decision-Lineage and Authority-Boundary Review. Record DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21991856. The companion is a subordinate public file within this record and carries no independent DOI or independent doctrinal standing. The governing paper defines a conditional, partial-order attribution chain for applicability decisions: T0 evidence, optional T1 Boundary Event classification, T2 standing or applicability assessment, optional T3 ACE declaration, T4 transition review or contract, T5 execution permission, T6 enforcement effect, and T7 bound record. The order is a map of burden and attribution, not a mandatory workflow, a controller, or an authority-transfer mechanism. The paper adds a typed attribution tuple covering object identity, claim lane, subject, source boundary, producer, mandate, scope, validity, causal order, time evidence, inputs, rule version, result, uncertainty, defeaters, falsifier, next-authority disposition, and record references. Every omitted type must be shown as inapplicable, not required by a standing policy, unavailable, rejected, or deferred. Silence and compressed workflow language are not valid omission dispositions. The record distinguishes evidence from classification; classification from assessment; assessment from ACE; ACE from transition authorization; transition authorization from concrete execution permission; permission from physical or transactional effect; and preservation from proof of upstream truth or authority. A causal arrow neither establishes identity nor transfers authority. Later success does not retroactively cure a missing burden or failed handoff. This contribution is distinct from the earlier Semantic Crosswalk and Type-Separation Canon Locks, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21985437. The Crosswalk owns load-bearing vocabulary and broad non-substitution rules. This record adds ordered attribution, handoff acceptance conditions, omission discipline, decision-lineage records, source-boundary controls, and category-misbinding falsifiers. It does not repeat the detailed Boundary Event taxonomy or runtime verifier implementation profile. Relation to adjacent work: W3C PROV and PROV-AGENT address provenance representation and agent-interaction lineage; Mnemosyne and Governing Actions, Not Agents address deterministic admission or independently attested conditions at consequential action; Atomic Decision Boundaries formalizes execution-time coupling. This record does not claim priority over those general ideas. Its narrower contribution is the cross-domain T0-T7 burden map, typed handoff acceptance, omission dispositions, category-misbinding falsifiers, next-authority disposition, and a T7 reconstruction boundary that does not manufacture upstream standing. Commercial Companion Note 15 is a public buyer-facing specification for a Typed Decision-Lineage and Authority-Boundary Review. The service reconstructs selected consequence-bearing paths, identifies where one lane is presented as another, maps assessment, declaration, transition, permission and enforcement authorities, tests omitted-type dispositions, and samples end-to-end record reconstruction. Public deliverable descriptions are included; client templates, scoring, prices, clauses, connectors, calibrated thresholds, automation schemas, test harnesses, and private review methods are not deposited. This record should be read with the governing Applicability Boundary Doctrine baseline DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19425317, the Corpus Continuity and Canon Policy Record DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21983371, the Semantic Crosswalk DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21985437, the Commit-Time Admissibility Preconditions DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21987027, the Reflexive Admissibility record DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21987654, The Commit-Time Conjunction DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21988251, and the immediately preceding Consequence-Bearing Transition Phase Model and Closure Obligations DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21990123. This record is not legal or actuarial advice, a safety case, certification, conformity assessment, class or flag approval, operational authorization, controller, incident-response plan, insurance rating plan, coverage opinion, policy wording, warranty, or proof that a particular system is safe, compliant, admissible, controllable, closed, or correct. It does not determine causation, liability, breach, reserve, indemnity, regulatory compliance, or legal sufficiency. Rights: GotoCalm Applicability Doctrine Terms of Use. See terms_of_use.txt in this record. Commercial implementation, operational integration, productization, paid assurance or audit products, paid procurement or insurer-facing services, typed decision-lineage reviews, derivative commercial frameworks, commercial training products, and other commercial reuse designed for sale or service delivery require separate written permission or licence unless independently established without reliance on the authored framework. Commercial application and confidential discussion: admin@gotocalm.com Suggested subject line: Typed Decision-Lineage and Authority-Boundary Review - Inquiry