Perception of forensic Odontologists on the usefulness of palatal Rugoscopy in Ecuador

Human identification is a fundamental process within forensic sciences, particularly in contexts where traditional identification methods are limited or inconclusive. In this framework, forensic odontology provides complementary techniques such as palatal rugoscopy, which is based on the morphological analysis of palatal rugae due to their individualizing characteristics and relative stability over time. The aim of this study was to analyze the perception of forensic odontologists regarding the usefulness of palatal rugoscopy as a method for human identification in Ecuador. A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. The population consisted of seven forensic odontologists, corresponding to the entire identified universe, who completed a structured questionnaire using a Likert-type scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including absolute frequencies and percentages. The results revealed a predominantly favorable perception of palatal rugoscopy, mainly recognized as a complementary method in human identification processes, with agreement levels ranging from 71.4% to 100%. However, the experts also identified significant limitations, such as the lack of technical regulations and standardized protocols, the absence of antemortem records, and gaps in specialized training. It is concluded that palatal rugoscopy has potential forensic value in the Ecuadorian context, provided that standardized protocols, specialized training, and institutional integration within the human identification system are strengthened.