Similar Outcomes for Fixation of Undisplaced Intracapsular Hip Fractures with Either Cannulated Screws or Dynamic Hip Screws in 255 Patients: A Comparison of Propensity-Matched Groups

Read full text
Authors: Benjamin Shardlow, Weronika Nocun, Abdul R Khater, Jessica Nightingale, Catherine Gordon, Alan R. Norrish
Cited by: 1
References: 27

Abstract

Purpose: Internal fixation of undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures is typically achieved using either cannulated screws (CS) or a 2-hole dynamic hip screw (DHS). However, there is a lack of consensus on which of these is more effective clinically. Whilst several biomechanical analyses of cadaveric hips show a higher construct stability of DHS fixation, there is a paucity of large clinical studies investigating patient outcomes. Materials and Methods: Data from 2,705 patients at a single institution, including 322 internal fixations, were analysed retrospectively. Propensity scores were calculated to mitigate for the impact of covariates such as age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index and Nottingham Hip Fracture Score, producing an eligible group of 255 patients. Results: =0.013), an 11% reduction. Conclusion: There is no difference in clinical outcomes between CS and DHS fixation of intracapsular hip fractures. However, in this cohort the operating time was approximately 5 minutes shorter in CS fixation.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Hip and Femur Fractures Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques Bone health and osteoporosis research

Publication details

Journal / source
Hip & Pelvis
Publisher
The Korean Hip Society
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
101–109
Publication date
1 March 2026
Language
EN