Unveiling the Shadows: Exploring Microaggressions Towards the LGBTQ Community at BASC as a Basis for Gender Responsive Interventions

Background and Objectives: People of diverse sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions, and sex characteristics (SOGIESC), better known as the LGBTQ community, often face a myriad of challenges that stem from societal prejudices and biases. One significant issue they encounter is the microaggression; a subtle yet pervasive form of discrimination that can manifest in everyday interactions, often going unnoticed by those who may not be directly affected. Microaggressions can appear in various forms, including dismissive comments, inappropriate jokes, or other behaviors that may seem innocuous on the surface but convey a deeper negative message. These interactions can create a hostile environment for LGBTQ individuals, as the cumulative effect of such microaggressions can undermine their sense of belonging and self-worth. This study aims to delve into the lived experiences of LGBTQ students and staff at Bulacan Agricultural State College (BASC). Through an in-depth examination of their encounters with microaggressions, this research seeks to highlight the emotional and psychological impact of these experiences, as well as the broader social dynamics at play within the college community. Moreover, addressing the issue of microaggressions is a crucial step toward creating a supportive and safe space for LGBTQ individuals in educational settings and beyond. Methodology: A qualitative research method design was employed in this study. This involved in-depth interviews with 18 participants, all conducted within a hermeneutic phenomenological framework. This approach emphasizes understanding the lived experiences of individuals and focuses on how they make sense of their realities. Main Results: From the interviews, several significant themes emerged that reflected the participants' experiences. These themes were hidden harms, silenced voices, institutional walls, and resilience and resistance. Discussions: Hidden harms suggests that there are types of harm that may not be immediately visible or acknowledged, either by the individuals affected or by institutions. Participants shared experiences of subtle forms of pain and distress that often go unrecognized, highlighting the complexity of their situations. Silenced voices reflect the idea that many participants felt their perspectives and experiences were not heard or valued. There was an overarching sense that, despite their struggles, their stories and opinions were sidelined, which contributed to feelings of isolation and frustration. Institutional walls capture the barriers created by institutional structures and policies that can hinder effective communication and support. Participants discussed how these walls can trap individuals in cycles of misunderstanding and disconnection from the help they need, leading to a systemic failure to address their concerns. Resilience and resistance depict how amidst the challenges, many participants exhibited remarkable resilience in coping with their circumstances. Conclusions: The findings illuminate the complex interplay of harm, voice, systemic barriers, and individual strength, offering valuable insights into the participants' experiences and the broader implications for understanding and addressing their needs. These results were vital to the formulation of gender-responsive services and interventions aimed at promoting gender-inclusive and safe spaces for people of diverse SOGIESC at BASC.