Courtroom Interaction and the Representation of Judicial Authority in Tanzania: A Critical Discourse Analysis

The purpose of this study is to examine how the court is represented in the discourse of selected High Courts and Magistrate Courts in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and to identify the discourse strategies employed by courtroom participants in constructing these representations. While prior research on Tanzanian courtroom discourse has addressed speech acts, interactional patterns, and power relations, the representational dimension has received comparatively limited scholarly attention. This gap restricts a comprehensive understanding of how judicial authority is discursively projected, how legal meanings are socially constructed, and how such representations influence public trust, legal literacy, and perceptions of judicial legitimacy within the Tanzanian socio-legal context. Guided by Fairclough and Wodak’s Critical Discourse Analysis framework, the study draws on data generated through participant observation, supported by detailed field notes recorded during live court proceedings. From the broader corpus, fifteen excerpts were purposively selected for close analysis. The findings indicate that the court is constructed through multiple institutional images, including as a supreme, democratic, presumptive, persuasive, welfare-oriented, and hierarchical authority. Six principal discourse strategies emerged: pronouncement or ruling, offering choices, imposing obligations, questioning, demonstrating consideration, and expressing deference. These strategies function as mechanisms of institutional power, enabling the court to adjudicate disputes, regulate behaviour, and sustain constructive interactional relations among participants in the maintenance of social order. These findings elucidate the discursive processes through which judicial authority is instantiated, negotiated, and legitimised. They contribute to ongoing debates on the decolonisation of legal discourse, inform considerations of judicial communication and professional training, and extend Critical Discourse Analysis scholarship within multilingual African legal settings.