APMP.EM.RF-K8.CL: Power in 50 ohm coaxial lines

Read full text Summarise with VIRAT
Authors: Kazuhiro Shimaoka, T Zhang, Liu Xinmeng, Wenze Yuan, Hau Wah Lai, Cho Man Tsui, Saood Ahmad, Jeong Hwan Kim, Jae–Yong Kwon, Jeong Il Park, Arshad bin Selamat, B D Hall
+8 more Yueyan Shan, Yusong Meng, Erik Dressler, Mariesa Nel, Linoh A. Magagula, Sarinya Pasakawee, Vitawat Sittakul, Chairat Wichainmongkonkun
Cited by: 0

Summary

No summary yet. VIRAT can read this paper and write a plain-language summary of its aim, methods, key findings and limitations.

Summarise with VIRAT Free to try with your Science Catalogs account.

Abstract

linking method with the assistance of the Applied Statistics Division of NMIJ in 2009.The members of the organization group (NMIJ, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science [KRISS], National Metrology Centre[NMC], and National Measurement Institute of Australia [NMIA]) discussed this linking method at the Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements 2010 held in South Korea.However, the members could not reach an agreement regarding the adoption of the method.As the coordinator reasoned that all possible efforts had been made, he decided to suspend this problem temporarily and restarted the preparation of traveling standards.However, the Higashi-Nihon Great Earthquake in 2011 forced the pilot laboratory to suspend the preparations for six months.Eleven NMIs from the APMP finally participated in this comparison.The comparison started in July 2012 and was completed in June 2014.During the comparison, the Measurement Standards Laboratory of New Zealand (MSLNZ)reported that a torque wrench sent with the traveling standards showed overtorque and returned it to the pilot laboratory.The pilot laboratory replaced it with a new torque wrench, because an oil shortage was observed.KRISS and NMIA requested a re-submission of their measurement results.As the requests were made before the publication of Draft A, the pilot laboratory accepted the re-submission according to international comparison rules.Additionally, a few laboratories erroneously reported relative values although the technical protocol required absolute values.They also re-submitted their results.The technical protocol was prepared according to the Guidelines for CIPM Key Comparisons [5, 6]. Participants and scheduleEleven countries participated in the international comparison, as listed in Table 2.1.This comparison was divided into two stages.Six and five countries participated in each half.The pilot laboratory conducted an initial measurement 5 before the first stage, an intermediate measurement between the two stages, and a final measurement after completion of the second stage.The complete schedule is summarized in Table 2.2.Table 2.1 List of participants Country/

Fields of Study & Subjects

Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques

Publication details

Publication date
10 March 2026
Language
FR