Structured AI Integration as Quality Control for Peer Review

Read full text
Authors: Stephen D. Turner
Cited by: 0

Abstract

A few weeks ago I wrote about the idea that AI could serve as a rubric enforcer in peer review, reducing the variability introduced by fatigue, mood, and ordering effects while preserving the domain expertise that makes review valuable. Related, late last year I wrote about how unregulated individual adoption of AI in review can introduce its own biases when reviewers selectively prompt and cherry-pick AI outputs.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Ethics and Social Impacts of AI Publishing and Scholarly Communication Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Publication details

Publication date
9 March 2026
Language
EN