Comparison of endodontic treatment success and implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation success rates: A prospective study

Read full text
Authors: Swapna Munaga, Ramanpreet Kaur, Priyanka Zinge, Akanksha Malik, Devashree Shukla, Ronak N. Patel, Miral Mehta
Cited by: 0

Abstract

The decision between preserving a tooth through contemporary endodontic treatment or extracting and replacing it with an implant- supported restoration remains one of the most debated topics in restorative dentistry. Therefore, it is of interest to compare long- term outcomes of endodontic treatment versus implant-supported crowns in 412 teeth from 378 patients over 10 years. The Endo group (206 teeth) received root canal treatment; the Implant group (206 teeth) had extraction and single implant placement. Strict success criteria assessed PAHI ≤1 for endodontics and minimal bone loss without complications for implants. At 10 years, success rates were 91.3% (Endo) versus 89.8% (Implant) (p=0.587); survival rates were 94.7% versus 97.1% (p=0.221). This advances knowledge by demonstrating equivalent long-term success of modern endodontics and implants when controlling periodontal health, informing tooth preservation decisions in restorative dentistry.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes Dental materials and restorations

Publication details

Journal / source
Bioinformation
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
500–503
Publication date
31 January 2026
Language
EN