Traditional versus compressive implant osseointegration after immediate placement: A randomized histomorphometric study

Bioinformation 2026 Open access

Read full text
Authors: Raj Kiran Chitumalla, Lalit Narayan Singh, Roshan Samuel, R. Rashmi R. Rashmi, Afreen Kouser, Meghna J. Pujara, Tanvi Hirani
DOI: 10.6026/973206300220908
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Immediate implant placement challenges primary stability and osseointegration in compromised extraction sockets with large gap distances or thin buccal plates. Therefore, it is of interest to compare 40 conventional tapered implants versus 40 compressive-thread implants in 80 patients. Primary outcomes included histomorphometric bone-to-implant contact (BIC%) and bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO%) at 4 months, plus ISQ stability values. Compressive implants showed superior BIC% (68.4 ± 8.7% vs 52.3 ± 9.1%, p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty Scientific and Engineering Research Topics

Publication details

Journal / source
Bioinformation
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
908–911
Publication date
28 February 2026
Language
EN