Parental acceptability of new RSV preventive therapies for infants: A cross-sectional survey in Canada

Read full text
Authors: Tiffany Fitzpatrick, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Rebecca Brundin‐Mather, Jade MacDonald, Blanchard, Wade, Shelly Bolotin, Sarah A. Buchan, Nicholas Brousseau, Eliana Castillo, Jeannette L. Comeau, Ève Dubé, Devon L. Greyson
+9 more Scott A. Halperin, Joanne Marie Langley, Janet S. W. Lee, Shannon E. MacDonald, Terra Manca, Stephana J. Moss, Jesse Papenburg, Nirma Khatri Vadlamudi, Donna M. Halperin
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Two new RSV immunization products exist for infants: a prenatal vaccine (RSVpreF) and a long-acting monoclonal antibody for infants (nirsevimab). While both showed promise in clinical trials, implementation has varied across jurisdictions. Before rollout in Canada, we conducted an anonymized, online survey with a nationally representative sample of 1,015 expectant and recent birth parents. The primary outcome was product acceptability (disagree, undecided, agree). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) identified factors associated with agreement or indecision versus disagreement. Approximately 49% (n = 499) were expecting; 51% (n = 516) had a baby in the past year. Overall, 72% (n = 727) agreed to receive a product: 61% (n = 624) for RSVpreF and 60% (n = 608) for nirsevimab. RSVpreF agreement was higher among older parents (e.g., OR = 3.64; 95% CI, 1.99–6.67 for age 25–34 versus 18–24 years), those with a university degree (OR = 3.65; 95% CI, 2.01–6.64 versus high school), higher income (OR = 2.31; 95% CI, 1.01–5.28 for ≥$150k versus

Fields of Study & Subjects

Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy Respiratory viral infections research Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare

Publication details

Journal / source
Figshare
Publication date
1 January 2026
Document type
Dataset