Conservation evidence is biased but can support decision-making for prevalent and severe threats in tetrapods: Data and R script
Abstract
Datasets and R script from González-Suárez, M et al (in press) Conservation evidence is biased but can support decision-making for prevalent and severe threats in tetrapods. Journal of Applied EcologySUMMARY OF FILES INCLUDED- CSV datasets: total 5 files representingConservationEvidenceScores.csv summary data reflecting listed intervations from the Conservation Evidence Synopses for tetrapods. See details in the paper and the Conservation Evidence website.ThreatComparison.csv summary dataset combining information from the IUCN Red List and the Conservation Evidence Synopses for tetrapods. See details in the paper and the Conservation Evidence and IUCN Red List websites.spatial_nbmodel_data.csv summary data from the Threat probability maps (see paper for details)spatial_study_sites_table_all.csv summary data combining information from studies described in the Conservation Evidence Synopses for tetrapods and the Threat probability maps values for those sites (see paper for details)spatial_values_table_all.csv summary data combining information from studies described in the Conservation Evidence Synopses for tetrapods and from all points in the Threat probability maps (see paper for details)- R script: one script that allows reproducing all statistical analyses and most figures. Maps showing the locations of the intervention sites (figures 4 and S5-8 in the paper) are not reproducible as the data are owned by Conservation Evidence and cannot be publicly shared by us.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Conservation
Ecology
Wildlife Education
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Figshare
- Publication date
- 1 January 2026
- Language
- EN