Additional file 1 of The comparative efficacy and safety of sweet solutions to reduce preterm infants’ pain levels: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Additional file 1: eTable 1. Search Strategy. eTable 2. Review eligibility criteria. eTable 3. Validated pain assessment tools. eTable 4. Characteristics population in trials include studies. eTable 5. List of excluded studies. eTable 6. Characteristics of direct comparison in the network meta-analysis. eTable 7. Treatment ranking probability using P-Score. eTable 8. Assessment of heterogeneity. eTable 9. Split of direct and indirect evidence. eTable 10. Assessment of global inconsistency. eTable 11. Full design-by-treatment interaction random effects model. eTable 12. Sensitivity analysis. eTable 13. Meta-regression. eFigure 1. The mean path length. eFigure 2. Risk of bias. eFigure 3. Network geometry. eFigure 4. Forest plot of direct comparison. eFigure 5. Forward plot of Cook’s distance for model of pain during recovery phase. eFigure 6. Forward plot of ratio of variance for model of pain during recovery phase. eFigure 7. Forward plot of z-values that compare relative treatment effects estimated from direct and indirect evidence. eFigure 8. Forward plot for P-score on pain during recovery phase. eFigure 9. Adjusted publication bias. eFigure 10. Forest plots of differences in pain during recovery phase by risk of bias. eFigure 11. Forest plots of differences in pain during recovery phase by painful procedure. eFigure 12. Forest plot of adverse events in pain reaction using the Peto, inverse variance, and exact methods.