Local Opposition to Renewable Energy: Integrating Misinformation and Controversy Perspectives

One widespread explanation for local opposition to renewable energy infrastructure is that opponents are often misinformed. This study examines the limitations of misinformation as an explanation and suggests the value of combining it with an approach drawn from the knowledge controversy literature. Based on a sample of 81 groups that oppose large-scale solar energy in the US and UK, the study analyzes 437 statements that link reasons for opposition with information sources. Quantitative analysis indicates that 79% of sources used are consistent with a broad information diet and variation across political jurisdictions, as found in knowledge controversies, rather than mainly sources more likely to be biased against solar farms. Qualitative analysis shows how both misinformation and controversy perspectives can improve interpretation and evaluation of argumentation. Policy implications include suggestions for improving siting policy that go beyond preemption of local authority or requirements for improved public participation.