Construction of an Evaluation Index System for the "Three-Wide Education" Mentor Team

This study focuses on the construction of an evaluation index system for the "Three-Wide Education" tutor team, aiming to address the current lack of systematic, scientific, and quantitative standards in evaluating university tutor teams. Through literature analysis and policy review, the research team established an evaluation system comprising 3 first-level indicators, 13 second-level indicators, and 24 third-level indicators, covering the three dimensions of input evaluation, process evaluation, and output evaluation. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was employed to determine indicator weights, with results showing that output evaluation (44.9%) and process evaluation (41.7%) dominate the system, highlighting the central role of educational effectiveness and implementation process. Among specific indicators, competency development, employment outcomes, and research growth guidance carry the highest weights, while participation in academic competitions and social practices, employment guidance services, and tutor incentives emerge as key evaluation points. The study demonstrates that this system emphasizes substantive outcomes and core indicators, providing a quantitative basis for the scientific evaluation and continuous improvement of university tutor teams, reflecting the "student development-centered" educational philosophy.