Human and comparative bomedical science, when methods count more than results
Abstract
The present Editorial deals with the paramount relevance of the scientific methodology employed for pursuing the objectives of any human and veterinary biomedical study. Within a sound "evidence-based medicine" perspective, the quality of obtained results should be evaluated on the basis of the methods used, either inspired by reliable bibliographic sources (e.g. PubMed) or, alternatively, by the web. In the latter case, a concrete risk refers to the possibility that results of doubtful, or even of no scientific value, may be magnified by the general public over those generated following a rigorous and standardized scientific methodology.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Animal testing and alternatives
Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Top Italian Scientists Journal
- Publisher
- Top Italian Scientists
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Publication date
- 13 January 2026