Agentic AI with Cybersecurity: How to focus on Risk Analysis via the MCP (Model–Control–Policy) Model

Rapidly advancing Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems that are equipped to autonomously reason, call upon tools, and perform self-directed tasks have transformed enterprise productivity as well as the threat landscape. In contrast to static machine learning (ML) pipelines, agentic systems purposefully interpret goals in real-time and make decisions, thereby injecting contextual feedback loops that increase attack vectors and introduce new classes of cyber-physical as well as data-centric risks. The current cybersecurity and governance models, such as NIST SP 800-53, MITRE ATLAS, and the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, cover parts of this spectrum but do not have an integrated model that can capture AI behaviors while also integrating organisational systemic control logic and governance obligations. The research presents an integrated Model–Control–Policy (MCP) risk-analysis model for agentic AI settings. The Model layer characterizes the technical sources of risk arising from model design, data provenance, and adversarial vulnerability. The Control layer includes runtime safety checks, access controls, and automatic containment mechanisms that ensure safe operation within defined limits. The latter means they can map these controls to the organizational governance and compliance regimes (EU AI Act or NIST AI RMF, for example) and cross-border regulatory requirements they may need. Combined with the MCP model, such a multi-locus common approach enriches an analytical framework for businesses to assess, monitor, and mitigate AI risks in a traceable, accountable manner.