Global Disparities in Neuroimaging Research for Mental Health Conditions

Read full text
Authors: Tatum Connell, Caio B. Casella, Nathália Bianchini Esper, Nim Tottenham, Mark Tomlinson, Agustín M. Ibáñez, Antonis A. Kousoulis, Soraya Seedat, Jason R. Bantjes, Brandon A. Kohrt, Matías Irarrázaval, Stephanie Hope Ameis
+10 more Luís Augusto Rohde, Dan Joseph Stein, Paul M. Thompson, Pedro Mario Pan, Zul Merali, Pedro Antonio Valdes-Sosa, Christian Kieling, Michael Peter Milham, Zeina Mneimneh, Giovanni Abrahão Salum
Cited by: 0
References: 32

Abstract

Abstract Background Scientific research remains disproportionately grounded in data from high-income countries (HICs), yet efforts to map the distribution of neuroimaging findings by income levels remain limited. Methods Using data from the ENIGMA Consortium, we conducted a systematic quantitative synthesis of 83 publications across nine psychiatric and neurological conditions, analyzing T1-weighted structural MRI data from 16,086 cases in 27 countries. Representation was mapped using World Bank income classifications and World Health Organization (WHO) regions. Results HICs contributed 90.5% of cases; upper-middle-income countries 7.9%; lower-middle-income countries 1.6%; and low-income countries none. Geographically, 85% of cases originated from North America and Europe, while Africa, South-East Asia, and the Eastern Mediterranean were underrepresented. Supplemental analyses of other datasets (Brain Growth Charts; fMRI meta-analysis) revealed similar disparities. Conclusions Equitable neuroimaging science is critical to inform practice and policy decision-making that is context specific. This requires targeted investment in infrastructure, data sharing, and participation from underrepresented regions.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Mental Health Treatment and Access Global Health and Surgery Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Publication details

Journal / source
medRxiv
Publication date
30 January 2026
Document type
Preprint