Prediction of Mutations and Outcome in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors with Deep Learning: A Multicenter, Multinational Study

Read full text
Authors: Arianna Bonetti, Van-Linh Le, Zunamys Itzell Carrero, F. Wolf, Marco Gustav, Suk Wai Lam, Lucile Vanhersecke, P. Sobczuk, François Le Loarer, Malgorzata Lenarcik, Piotr Rutkowski, Joris M. van Sabben
+43 more Neeltje Steeghs, Hester H. van Boven, Isidro Morales Machado, Sílvia Bagué, Samuel Navarro, Emilio Medina-Ceballos, Carolina Agra‐Pujol, Francisco Giner, Gustavo Tapia, Alba Hernández-Gallego, Gema Civantos-Jubera, Míriam Cuatrecasas, Sandra López‐Prades, Raul Ezequiel Perret, I. Soubeyran, Emmanuel Khalifa, Laura Blouin, Eva Wardelmann, Alexandra Meurgey, Paola Collini, Artem Voloshin, Yasushi Yatabe, Hidekazu Hirano, Alessandro Gronchi, Toshirou Nishida, Olivier Bouché, J.F. Emile, Carine Ngo, Peter Hohenberger, Cristina Cotarelo, Jens Jakob, Judith V.M.G. Bovée, Hans A. J. Gelderblom, Anna Szumera‐Ciećkiewicz, Myriam Jean‐Denis, Julien Bollard, Nathalie Lassau, Axel Le Cesne, Jean‐Yves Blay, Antoîne Italiano, Amandine Crombé, JM Coindre, Jakob Nikolas Kather
Cited by: 0
References: 23

Abstract

Abstract Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor, driven by tyrosine-protein kinase KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) mutations. Specific variants, such as KIT exon 11 deletions, carry prognostic and therapeutic implications, whereas wild-type (WT) variants derive limited benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Given the limited reproducibility of established clinicopathological risk models, deep learning (DL) applied to whole-slide images (WSIs) emerged as a promising tool for molecular classification and prognostic assessment. Patients and methods We analyzed 8398 GIST cases from 21 centers in 7 countries, including 7238 with molecular data and 2638 with clinical follow-up. DL models were trained on WSIs to predict mutations, treatment sensitivity, and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results DL predicted mutational status in GIST from WSIs, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 for KIT , 0.96 for PDGFRA . High performance was observed for subtypes, including KIT exon 11 delinss 557–558 (0.67) and PDGFRA exon 18 D842V (0.93). For therapeutic categories, performance reached 0.84 for avapritinib sensitivity, 0.81 for imatinib sensitivity. DL models predicted RFS, with hazard-ratios (HR) of 8.44 (95%CI 6.14–11.61) in the overall cohort and 4.74 (95%CI 3.34–6.74) in patients receiving adjuvant therapy. Prognostic performance was comparable to pathology-based scores, with highest discrimination in the overall cohort and in patients without adjuvant therapy (9.44, 95%CI (5.87–15.20)). Conclusion DL applied to WSIs enables prediction of molecular alterations, treatment sensitivity, and RFS in GIST, performing comparably to established risk scores across international cohorts, providing a baseline for future multimodal predictors. Highlights Deep learning on histology predicts KIT and PDGFRA mutations in a large international cohort of GISTs from multiple centers Whole-slide image models stratify recurrence-free survival comparable to pathology-based risk scores Prognostic value of deep learning is preserved in adjuvant therapy subgroups, supporting treatment duration decisions Graphical abstract. Overview of study design and dataset characteristics. (A) Multinational collection of WSIs from seven countries (Spain, France, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, and Japan), followed by standard image preprocessing with the STAMP pipeline and clinical data preprocessing/standardization via the Grammar Data Curation framework. The workflow was divided into two main branches: (i) molecular mutation and treatment sensitivity prediction, and (ii) RFS prediction. Model performance was evaluated using AUROC and F1 score for classification tasks, and Kaplan–Meier survival curves with hazard ratios for RFS. Model explainability was assessed through heatmaps of WSIs and identification of top predictive tiles. (B) Summary of clinical dataset composition: proportion of cases receiving adjuvant therapy, tumor location distribution, mutation distribution at the exon level, and mutation distribution at the codon level.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment AI in cancer detection Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Publication details

Journal / source
medRxiv
Publication date
3 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint