Pilot screening multivariable prediction model for late diagnosed cystic fibrosis

Read full text
Authors: Richard A. Belkin, Yuri P. Matusov, Barry Belkin
Cited by: 0
References: 12

Abstract

Abstract Background Diagnosing cystic fibrosis (CF) in adults is challenging. Patients often present with atypical and varied symptoms. The aim of this study is to develop a pilot prediction model to aid clinicians in identifying patients who should undergo appropriate CF diagnostic testing. Methods This is a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study of adult (≥18 yrs) patients who underwent sweat testing for evaluation of clinically suspected CF. Dataset 1 includes 171 patients with CF-supportive conditions from 2005-2021 and was used both to develop the screening model and to subject it to internal validation. Dataset 2 includes 87 patients with CF-supportive conditions from 2021-2023 and was used to subject the prediction model to external validation. Based on CF Foundation guidelines, dataset patients were each assigned one of three CF classifications: (1) CF likely (Type A ), (2) CF not resolved (Type B ), or (3) CF unlikely (Type C ). Clinical predictor variables indicate the presence (value=1) or absence (value=0) of 7 CF-related clinically observable patient conditions. The screening model decision rule recommends a patient for CF testing if either of two conditions holds: (1) A numerical patient score S A calculated using multivariate logistic regression (LR) equals or exceeds a threshold value C 0 determined using ROC curve analysis, or (2) the patient diagnosis is positive for bronchiectasis/tree-in-bud and negative or unknown for each of 6 other clinical conditions. Results For each dataset, the observed sensitivity value for recommending CF testing was 1.00 for patients that CF testing classified as Type A or Type B . Further, for the two datasets in combination, 2/128=1.56% of the Type C patients were not recommended for CF testing. Conclusions When applied separately to each dataset, the screening model matched the predictive accuracy of clinical judgment both for Type A and Type B patients. A similar predictive accuracy comparison for Type C patients is not possible because the CF types are unknown for patients not recommended for CF testing.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research Genomics and Rare Diseases

Publication details

Journal / source
medRxiv
Publication date
14 February 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint