Validated Synthetic Data Generation from a Multicenter Spine Surgery Registry: Methodology and Benchmark

ABSTRACT Background Synthetic data have emerged as a complementary strategy for secondary use of clinical registries, enabling data sharing without patient-level exposure. In spine surgery, multicenter data sharing is constrained by institutional governance and patient privacy regulations. Validated synthetic data generation may enable broader access to surgical outcomes data for artificial intelligence development without compromising patient confidentiality. Objective To describe and benchmark a three-domain validated synthetic data pipeline applied to a multicenter, tokenized spine surgery registry (SpineBase), and to establish a reproducible certification framework for synthetic spine surgery datasets. Methods We extracted 125 sacroiliac joint fusion cases from the SpineBase registry (SIBONE study, IRB-SOFCOT approval Ref. 14–2025; CNIL MR-004 Ref. 2234503 v 0). A GaussianCopula generative model was trained on 52 structured variables spanning demographics, preoperative assessments, operative details, and longitudinal outcomes at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Synthetic datasets of 100, 1,000, and 10,000 patients were generated. Validation followed a three-domain framework: (1) fidelity, assessed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and Jensen-Shannon divergence; (2) utility, assessed by train-on-synthetic, test-on-real (TSTR) methodology; and (3) privacy, assessed by nearest-neighbor distance ratio (NNDR), membership inference attack, and k-anonymity proxy. Results All three validation gates passed. Fidelity: mean KS p-value 0.52 (threshold >0.05). Privacy: NNDR >1.0 in 98.9% of synthetic records; membership inference AUROC 0.57. Utility: 12-month Oswestry Disability Index prediction yielded Pearson r = 0.29, consistent with expected attenuation at N = 125. A SHA-256 cryptographic hash of each certified dataset was anchored on the Solana blockchain for immutable provenance. Conclusions A validated, blockchain-anchored synthetic data pipeline for spine surgery registries is technically feasible and meets current publication-standard criteria for fidelity and privacy. Utility metrics scale with registry size, creating a direct incentive for multicenter data contribution. This framework provides a reproducible methodology for synthetic data certification in spine surgery research, and establishes certified synthetic datasets as a privacy-native substrate for expert-annotation pipelines — as demonstrated in the companion Spine Reviews study.