How Mentoring Networks Shape Early-Career Grant Success: Evidence from NIH K-awardees

Abstract Effective mentorship is essential for strengthening the STEMM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine) workforce, yet empirical evidence on how mentorship networks are structured and linked to career success remains limited. Here, we analyze mentorship networks among recipients of NIH career development (K) awards to characterize network size, mentor roles, and their associations with mentee-reported outcomes, including potential variation by sociodemographic characteristics. We found that K-awardees rely on mentors beyond their primary advisor, who play varying roles beyond being a Research mentor. Different mentor roles led to different types of mentoring outcomes; while Research mentors were associated with research-related outcomes such as Publications and Grants, career- and psychosocial-related mentoring outcomes were more likely to come from other types of mentors, such as Coaches, Connectors, and Sponsors. Larger networks, as well as having Peer and Identity mentors are additively beneficial for researchers who identify as underrepresented in science more than their counterparts. This study provides large-scale evidence on how mentorship network configurations relate to early-career grant success.