Emotions and Cognition in the Moral Brain: A Neuroscientific Review of the Dual-Process Theories of Decision Making

Read full text
Authors: Wade Eubank
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Moral decision-making is a pivotal human process that requires a harmonious balance between emotion, reasoning, and social context. With recent advances in cognitive neuroscience, it has been revealed that moral judgements are driven by multiple brain systems, including the amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Together, these regions interact to evaluate dilemmas individuals may face and guide one’s behavior. This literature review synthesizes findings from functional imaging, lesion, and studies to address an overarching question: Are moral judgements primarily driven by emotion or rational processes? Evidence suggests that emotional responses, supported by the vmPFC and limbic structures, are more associated with rapid, intuitive moral judgements, whereas cognitive mechanisms in the dlPFC are utilized for more deliberate, or high-conflict decisions (Qu et al., 2022). The interplay between these two forces bolsters the dual-process theory of moral cognition, where emotion and rationality coexist rather than be opposing forces. Understanding this interplay provides insight and vital information regarding ethical behaviors, legal responsibilities, and artificial intelligence systems that are devised to mimic human’s moral capacities.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies Ethics in Business and Education

Publication details

Journal / source
Scholarly review .
Volume
Scholarly Debut
Issue
Winter 2025/2026
Publication date
12 January 2026
Language
EN