Uso de materiales de control de pérdidas de circulación (LCM) en la perforación de pozos petroleros: artículo de revisión

Read full text
Authors: Nicómedes Saavedra-Arancibia, Mirna Villegas, Sara Vladislavic-Mendoza, Deyvi Bustamante Perez, Silverio Arancibia
Cited by: 0
References: 31

Abstract

Lost circulation during oil well drilling represents a technical and economic challenge, compromising wellbore stability and operational safety. This study aimed to critically review the loss control materials (LCMs) used between 2021 and 2025. The PRISMA 2020 protocol was applied to 171 articles from Scopus and ScienceDirect, discarding duplicates and meeting inclusion criteria. 22 studies were analyzed using Rayyan and VOSviewer. The results showed three groups of LCMs: traditional ones composed of plant fibers and mineral particles with filtration reduction up to 40%; hybrid and cementitious ones consisting of thermosetting gels, EICP, MOS cements, and thixotropic cements with efficiencies greater than 80% up to 150°C and 1000 psi; and smart systems such as SMP foams, self-healing gels, microcapsules, and elastomeric microspheres with dynamic adaptability, shape recovery >98%, and sealing up to 8.97 MPa. The discussion highlights an evolution from basic solutions to hybrid and smart systems and highlights the need to incorporate artificial intelligence to optimize LCM selection in real time. It is concluded that, despite advances, it is essential to standardize testing protocols, validate on a commercial scale, and integrate predictive tools for more efficient loss control.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Drilling and Well Engineering Grouting Rheology and Soil Mechanics Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

Publication details

Journal / source
Revista Multidisciplinar Epistemología de las Ciencias
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1136–1159
Publication date
10 February 2026
Language
EN