Bankruptcy and Mass Torts After Harrington v. Purdue

View at publisher
Authors: Eric A. Helland, Lloyd Dixon, Jamie Morikawa, James Melvin Anderson, Bethany Saunders-Medina
Cited by: 0

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma has had major implications for the use of bankruptcy as a mass-tort resolution mechanism. The extent to which parties can still achieve—or approximate—a global resolution in bankruptcy remains uncertain under the new legal framework. Researchers analyzed Harrington’s potential impact; in this report, they present their findings.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Corporate Insolvency and Governance Law Economics and Judicial Systems Dispute Resolution and Class Actions

Publication details

Journal / source
RAND Corporation eBooks
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Book