Low-Volume Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation in Hospitalized Adults

View at publisher
Authors: Leonardo Frazzoni, Paola Cesaro, Franco Radaelli, Carlo Fabbri, Simona Guglielmo, Alessandro Mussetto, Mauro Manno, Cecilia Lina Pugliano, Francesco Segatta, Edoardo Pezzuto, Emanuel Raschi, Antonio Facciorusso
+22 more Cesare Hassan, Cristiano Spada, Lorenzo Fuccio, INTERPRET Study Group, Sofia Ballanti, Amanda Bendandi, Cecilia Binda, Francesco Bombaci, Diego Castronovo, Pietro Fusaroli, Giulia Gibiino, Roberta Grosso, Simona Guglielmo, Liboria Laterza, Joachim Rainer, R. Pileggi, Simone Rocchetto, Elisa Romagnoli, Emanuele Rondonotti, Tony Sabatini, Elisa Tabbone, Carla Treppiccione
Cited by: 1
References: 19

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate bowel preparation is essential for high-quality colonoscopy but remains challenging in hospitalized patients, and comparative data on preparation volume are limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of very low-volume (1-liter [1L]), low-volume (2-liter [2L]), and high-volume (4-liter [4L]) polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimens for inpatient colonoscopy preparation. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized controlled, endoscopist-blinded trial. (EudraCT: 2019-002799-15; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04708366). SETTING: Community and academic hospitals in Italy. PATIENTS: Hospitalized adults undergoing elective colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to split-dose 1L PEG-ascorbate, 2L PEG-ascorbate, or 4L PEG. MEASUREMENTS: Primary end point was adequate bowel cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale [BBPS] score ≥6 with all segments ≥2). Secondary end points included high-quality cleansing (BBPS score, 8 to 9), high-quality right-colon cleansing (BBPS score, 3), and willingness to repeat. RESULTS: = 219), adequate overall cleansing occurred in 82.0%, 78.0%, and 78.5% (absolute difference between the 1L and 2L groups [Δ1L-2L], 4.0 percentage points [95% CI, -3.4 to 11.4 percentage points]; absolute difference between the 1L and 4L groups [Δ1L-4L], 3.5 percentage points [CI, -3.9 to 10.9 percentage points]). High-quality overall cleansing occurred in 46.9%, 35.3%, and 37.4% (Δ1L-2L, 11.6 percentage points [CI, 2.5 to 20.5 percentage points]; Δ1L-4L, 9.5 percentage points [CI, 0.3 to 18.5 percentage points]). High-quality right-colon cleansing occurred in 40.6%, 29.5%, and 31.6% (Δ1L-2L, 11.2 percentage points [CI, 2.1 to 20.0 percentage points]; Δ1L-4L, 9.0 percentage points [CI, 0.0 to 17.9 percentage points]). Tolerability was good across regimens, with the highest willingness to repeat in the 1L group (84.2%), despite more frequent vomiting and thirst. LIMITATION: Patients requiring urgent colonoscopy for active gastrointestinal bleeding and those with severe/unstable comorbid conditions were excluded. CONCLUSION: In hospitalized adults undergoing elective colonoscopy, 1L PEG-ascorbate yielded higher rates of high-quality cleansing, including right colon, than 2L PEG-ascorbate and 4L PEG, with similar rates of adequate cleansing and high willingness to repeat. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Norgine Srl.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection

Publication details

Journal / source
Annals of Internal Medicine
Publisher
American College of Physicians
Volume
179
Issue
6
Pages
785–793
Publication date
4 May 2026
Language
EN