Evaluation of a Community-Based Chronic Kidney Disease Screening Program at a Senior Living Community in Blacksburg, Virginia

Read full text
Authors: Tobias K. Fuchs, Ashley Funkhouser, Elizabeth Geddes, Youssef Moustafa, Michael DeGrassi, Waleed Iftikhar, Patrick Buchanan, Dawson Downing, Jessica Nicholson, Bernard Kadio
Cited by: 0
References: 15

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often asymptomatic until advanced stages, predominantly affecting adults aged ≥65 years. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) currently states that there is insufficient evidence to perform routine screening for CKD in those who do not display symptoms. Without proper guidelines to routinely perform these tests, free screenings are scarce throughout the United States, but are offered by certain organizations such as the Kidney Disease Screening and Awareness Program (KDSAP). In October 2024, the Virginia Tech Chapter of KDSAP performed a free CKD screening at Warm Hearth Village (WHV) retirement home in Blacksburg, Virginia, an ideal population to catch early progression of this disease. This study aimed to understand if this screening increased awareness, convenience/satisfaction, follow-up adherence, and recommendations for program improvement. Methods: A cross-sectional, anonymous survey was distributed to 36 residents who participated one year after the screening. The option of an electronic or paper copy of our survey was provided by the WHV staff and collected upon completion. No reminder or follow-up contact regarding surveys was provided. RESULTS: Eleven out of 36 participants responded to the survey. Results showed that the program was convenient or very convenient (72.8%), the program improved understanding of kidney health (81.8%), explanations varied in clarity (45.5% completely clear, 45.5% somewhat clear, 9% not clear), and the program left participants satisfied or very satisfied (63.6%), with strong interest in future screenings (81.8%). Every responder agreed with expansion to other communities (100%). Suggested areas for improvement include time and availability, wait times, explanation of results, and follow-up communication. CONCLUSION: Community-based CKD screenings appear feasible and well-received, but improved scheduling, staffing, education, and explanation of results may enhance program effectiveness.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes Dialysis and Renal Disease Management

Publication details

Journal / source
Cureus
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
e101303–e101303
Publication date
11 January 2026
Language
EN