Does Pronator Quadratus Repair Affect the Functional Outcome Following Volar Plate Fixation for Distal End Radius Fracture?

Background and objective Distal radius fractures represent the most common upper extremity injury requiring surgical intervention. Volar plate fixation necessitates division of the pronator quadratus muscle, yet the necessity of systematic muscle repair remains controversial. While some studies suggest enhanced functional outcomes with repair, others demonstrate equivalent recovery patterns regardless of muscle reconstruction. This study aimed to analyze functional outcomes following volar plate fixation for distal radius fractures, comparing patients with and without pronator quadratus repair. Methodology A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving sixty patients with displaced distal radius fractures treated with volar plate fixation between September 2023 and October 2024. Patients were stratified into pronator quadratus repair (n=31) and non-repair (n=29) groups. Functional assessment utilized the validated Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire at eight weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively. Additional measurements included range of motion parameters, grip strength assessment using standardized dynamometry, and isokinetic forearm rotation strength evaluation. Statistical analysis employed independent t-tests, chi-square tests, repeated measures analysis of variance, and multivariate linear regression modeling. Results No significant differences existed in baseline demographics between groups. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores demonstrated equivalent functional recovery at six months, with scores of 105.65 ± 13.15 versus 107.07 ± 12.43 (p=0.663). While initial advantages occurred in pronation strength 58.55 ± 4.12 degrees versus 55.17 ± 4.12 degrees (p=0.002) and wrist extension 65.97 ± 5.23 degrees versus 60.17 ± 1.63 degrees (p