Improving Compliance With the Surgical Safety Checklist: A Quality Improvement Project at Almanagil Teaching Hospital, Sudan

Read full text
Authors: Marwa Yousif, Ibrahim Adil Hamadelniel Alhadi, Elwathig Abdalla, Husham Siddig Ahmad Altayeb, Israa Awad Ahmed Mohamed, Mohanad Elsafi Mossaad Elbashier, Hashim Bashir Elmadani Ahmed, Mohamed W. Ziada, Ibrahim Hamad Ibrahim Hamad, Mohey Aldien Ahmed Elamin Elnour, Hisham Omer, Mohammad Alrawi
+8 more Ahmed Modawi Bakheet Jabraldar, Eman Abubakeralsideeg Diaaldeen Mohamed, Mohammed Ahmed Nasir Ahmed, Manasik M. El Murtada Mubarak Ismail, Husam Eldin Abuelgassim Hassan Balila, Wafa Abdalla, Israa Awad Ahmed Mohamed, Abubakr Muhammed
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Background: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a globally recognized tool that reduces perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, adherence to SSC practices remains suboptimal in many low-resource settings. Purpose: This project aimed to assess and improve compliance with the WHO SSC and operative documentation standards at Al Managil Teaching Hospital, Sudan. Methods: A two-cycle quality improvement audit was conducted in July 2025. In the first cycle, 50 randomly selected operative notes were reviewed for SSC compliance. Interventions included staff training, standard documentation templates, visual reminders, and regular feedback. Another 50 randomly selected postoperative notes were reassessed after implementation. Data were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Compliance improved across nearly all SSC domains. Pulse oximeter checks increased from 9 (18%) to 50 (100%), anesthesia machine and medication checks from 10 (20%) to 50 (100%), and allergy checks from 9 (18%) to 49 (98%) (all p < 0.001). Before incision, equipment issue documentation rose from four (8%) to 50 (100%), team introductions from 11 (22%) to 50 (100%), and timely antibiotic prophylaxis from 42 (84%) to 50 (100%) (p = 0.01). Demographic documentation (gender, unit, address) improved from 0 (0%) to 50 (100%). Only surgical site marking (from 54% to 62%) and risk checks (from 90% to 98%) showed a non-significant change. Conclusion: Educational and structural interventions, including standardized templates and feedback, significantly enhanced SSC adherence and documentation quality. The project demonstrates that low-cost, sustainable quality improvement measures can foster a culture of surgical safety in resource-limited hospitals.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Patient Safety and Medication Errors Infection Control in Healthcare Surgical site infection prevention

Publication details

Journal / source
Cureus
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
c392–c392
Publication date
9 January 2026
Language
EN