APROXIMACIONES SOBRE EL DERECHO A INTERROGAR Y CONTRAINTERROGAR: EL USO DE PREGUNTAS SUGESTIVAS EN EL JUICIO ORAL
Abstract
This paper shows that judges often impose limitations on the use of leading questions in cross-examination during oral trials. In this sense, considering that conceptual and substantiation gaps have an unquestionable impact on the protection of human rights, the authors specify in this documentary research the inherent aspects of the concept and foundation of the right to examine and cross-examine to prevent the vagueness of these elements from causing this right to be unprotected.
Fields of Study & Subjects
Legal processes and jurisprudence
Criminal Law and Evidence
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Publication details
- Journal / source
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
- Publication date
- 1 January 2026
- Language
- ES