Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine Reduces Median Effective Doses of Propofol Required for Successful Gastroscope Insertion: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Dose-Finding Trial

Read full text
Authors: Zhu Q, Pei-Pei Hao, Cui LL, Liu FK, Fu-Shan Xue
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Qian Zhu,1 Pei-Pei Hao,2 Ling-Li Cui,1 Fu-Kun Liu,1 Fu-Shan Xue1,3 1Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Henan Province, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Anesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Fu-Shan Xue, Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, NO. 95 Yong-An Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13911177655, Email xuefushan@aliyun.comPurpose: Patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) typically receive propofol-based sedation. However, the exact dose of propofol when combined with low-dose dexmedetomidine for this procedure remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the median effective doses (ED50, the doses required for successful gastroscope insertion in 50% of the subjects) of propofol when used with low-dose dexmedetomidine (0.3 μg/kg) premedication versus propofol alone during painless GIE.Patients and Methods: Adult outpatients aged 18 to 65 years scheduled for GIE were enrolled. Participants were randomized to receive either 0.9% saline (Group S) or 0.3 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine (Group D) intravenously over 5 min before induction with propofol. Using modified Dixon’s up-and-down method (MDUDM), the initial induction dose of propofol was 1.5 mg/kg, adjusted in a step size of 0.1 mg/kg. ED50 of propofol required for successful endoscope insertion was calculated by averaging the midpoints of all sequential crossovers. Using isotonic regression analysis, ED50 and ED95 (the effective doses required for successful gastroscope insertion in 95% of the subjects) were then extrapolated. All adverse events during painless GIE were recorded.Results: Thirty patients were enrolled per group. Using MDUDM, the ED50 of propofol for successful gastroscope insertion was significantly lower in Group D (1.48 ± 0.10 mg/kg) than in Group S (1.82 ± 0.16 mg/kg; P < 0.001). The ED50 and ED95 of propofol were extrapolated to 1.80 mg/kg (83% confidence interval [CI], 1.649– 1.882) and 2.10 mg/kg (83% CI, 2.081– 2.124) for Group S, respectively, using isotonic regression analysis. These values were significantly lower in Group D, at 1.40 mg/kg (83% CI, 1.297– 1.452) and 1.70 mg/kg (83% CI, 1.667– 1.753).Conclusion: Premedication with low-dose dexmedetomidine (0.3 μg/kg) significantly reduces the median effective doses of propofol required for successful gastroscope insertion during painless GIE.Keywords: dexmedetomidine, propofol, effective dose, gastrointestinal endoscopy, sedation

Fields of Study & Subjects

Anesthesia and Sedative Agents Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia Anesthesia and Pain Management

Publication details

Journal / source
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN