Workshop on fourth generation ecosystem overviews (WKEO4; outputs from 2025 meeting)

Read full text
Authors: Catarina Abril, Jennifer Bailey, Andrea Belgrano, Ilaria Bellomo, Jacob Bentley, Francisco Campuzano, Andrea Chan, Patricia M. Clay, Rufus Danby, C. L. Faithfull, Gomes, Inês, Hackett, Michelle
+43 more Katell Gaelle Hamon, Deevesh Ashley Hemraj, Oliver T. Hogg, Kirstin K. Holsman, Maria José Rico, Andy Kenny, Marie Le Bras, Sigrid Lehuta, Lísa Anne Libungan, Marcos Llope, Chris Lynam, Inigo Martinez, Roi Martinez, Arina Motova-Surmava, Angela Muench, Fabiana Nogueira, Henn Ojaveer, Gerjan Piet, Benjamin Planque, Riikka Puntila-Dodd, Kurt Rachlitz, Marie-Julie Roux, Sevrine Sailley, Lea Schönen, Sónia Seixas, Ana Paula Silva, Warsha Singh, Daniel Steadman, Nathalie A. Steins, Kasia Stepanowska, Nicolas Sturaro, Dorota Szalaj, Tamara Talevska, Tam, Jamie, Murray S. A. Thompson, Robert Thorpe, Maria Torres Leal, Bryony L. Townhill, Morgane Travers‐Trolet, Xosé Tubío, Sebastian Valanko, Sarah Weisberg, Elizabeth West
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Ecosystem Overviews (EOs) are central products in the ICES approach to support Ecosystem Based Management, through providing the ecoregion context, identifying main pressures, associated human activities and impacts on ecosystem state. The Workshop on fourth generation ecosystem overviews (WKEO4) reviewed and updated priority topic lists for the EOs, discussed and advanced climate change impacts, and social and economic context sections in the EOs, and developed recommendations on how to improve the utility of EOs to meet advisory and decision-making needs. The workshop proposed the following five priority topics to be included/advanced in EOs: effects of climate change, foresight (with a focus on spatial analyses), cumulative effects, biodiversity and functional diversity, and trade-offs between ecological, social and economic sustainability. These priorities reflect a consensus to update EOs from static, descriptive summaries into dynamic, integrated, and operational tools that explicitly link ecosystem information and advice to options for management responses. Workshop discussions also highlighted the need for stronger connections between ecological and social information, improved visual and spatial presentation of results, and greater alignment with international and regional policy frameworks such as the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive, OSPAR, and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Participants also discussed the need to more systematically adopt available workflow resources (e.g. Transparent Assessment Framework), interactive delivery platforms (e.g. ICES Xplorer suite), and novel methodologies applied within ICES (e.g. Spatial Cumulative Assessment of Impact Risk for Management). Doing so would help transition EOs towards a more modular structure, where sections can be updated more readily with self-contained methods, code, and analyses. With this, we aim to streamline EO updates and enable EOs to transition into an online application. Further work should include workshops on: i) societal/management objectives to support EOs, ii) developing guidance on social and economic data collection, use and documentation, iii) revised risk assessment methodology and a follow-up benchmark (Workshop on methods and guidelines to link human activities, pressures and state of the ecosystem in Ecosystem Overviews 2 (WKTRANSPARENT2)), and iv) Fifth Generation EOs (WKEO5).

Fields of Study & Subjects

Coastal and Marine Management Marine and fisheries research Environmental and Social Impact Assessments

Publication details

Journal / source
Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Publication date
14 January 2026
Language
EN